Relative Gold

Relative gold (a.k.a. rgold, r-gold, relgold, or rel-gold) is a term used to describe the price of gold in relation to the moving average of this price. One concrete formulation of relative gold is as a ratio of the current price of gold to the 200-day moving average of this price. Specific values of this ratio could then be used to find signs for the gold market.

If we define relative gold as the ratio of the last close to the 200-day moving average, then this ratio will fluctuate, usually not very far from 1. The value of 1 means that the last close is equal to the 200-day moving average. Values below 1 mean that the last close is lower than the moving average and values above 1 mean that the last close is higher than the moving average. These three situations show three potentially different things.

Relative gold at 1 suggests that gold is now trading where it has traded in the last 200 days (on average). The easiest interpretation is that gold has not displayed one clear trend in the last 200 days. This might be the result of a sideways trend, a local top or a local bottom.

Relative gold below 1 suggests that the last close is lower than the average price over the last 200 days which is a sign that the price is potentially trending lower. Conversely, relative gold above hints that the current price is above the average of the prices from the last 200 days. This is a suggestion that the price is in an uptrend.

Let’s take a look at the long-term relative gold chart where we see relative gold along with the price of gold. This chart presents data for the time frame from 1975 to 2018. The price of gold is the red line (right axis) while relative gold is the blue line (left axis).

Relative gold

On this chart, if we take a look at times when relative gold crossed the 1 level decisively, this usually happened during downtrends. One extreme example would be the decline from the all-time high of 1980. On the flip side, the times when relative gold crossed the 1 level from below in a strong manner usually corresponded to uptrends. Examples of this could be seen in the 2000s when gold was in a clear uptrend. On the whole, the analogy between the 1 level and trends is not perfect but is seems to be there.

The 1 level is not the only one to be observed. Actually, one factor seems even more important than the 1 level for the analysis of gold prices. Namely, extreme levels of relative gold might also be important for gold prices. First of all, in the long-term time horizon, extremely low levels of relative gold might be a contrarian sign just as extremely low levels of gold prices might be contrarian signs. If we take a look at the 0.9 level and the times went below this level and did so strongly, usually coincide with periods when the local bottom was not far away (from the long-term perspective). Examples of that include: the bottom before the move to the 1980 top, the bottom before the rebound in 1982, the bottom in late 1984, the 2008 bottom. So, while the analogy is not perfect, as there are periods when the 0.9 level did not immediately herald major bottoms (again, from the long-term perspective), the 0.9 level could be used in conjunction with other signs to confirm important bottoms.

The other side of the spectrum are extremely high relative gold levels, which could potentially be contrarian signs for tops. If we take a look at the 1.2 level, we see that it frequently coincides with significant long-term tops, when broken decisively. This was the case during the 1980 top when relative gold went above 2.4. This was a clearly extreme level. Other examples include: the 1982 top, the 2006 local top, the 2008 local top, the 2009 local top, the end of the bull market in 2011. It does seem that this level was particularly useful to detect tops during bull markets.

We could also focus on different time horizons. Let’s take a look at the 2000-2018 chart.

Relative gold

The 1.2 level might be interpreted as being a similar signal for the market as previously – it might suggest local tops. The other level we would like to discuss is the 1 level. In this time horizon, 1 or a move below it could signal local bottoms just as 0.9 did on the previous chart. But we could also interpret significant breaks below this level as ones signaling shifts in the market. Examples of this include: the 2006 significant local bottom, the 2008 shift in the market when forced liquidation might have pushed gold sharply lower, the end of the bull market and the shift to a bear market in 2011-2013. The 1 level seems like one to observe and to analyze together with other signals in order to identify what’s going on in the gold market.